This rubric is designed to assess the performance of third-year undergraduate students in a Comparative Politics course. The evaluation criteria focus on key learning objectives; including analytical skills; critical thinking; and the ability to compare political systems across different countries. Students will be expected to demonstrate a strong understanding of theoretical frameworks; empirical evidence; and methodological approaches used in comparative political analysis. The rubric evaluates students on their ability to identify and explain similarities and differences between political institutions; processes; and outcomes in various contexts. Strong performance requires clear articulation of arguments; supported by relevant examples and scholarly sources. Students should also show proficiency in applying comparative methods to analyze case studies; demonstrating how different political systems address similar challenges. Written assignments will be assessed based on coherence; logical structure; and depth of analysis. Students must present well-reasoned conclusions that reflect an understanding of competing perspectives in the field. Participation in discussions and collaborative work will be evaluated based on engagement; contribution to peer learning; and the ability to constructively critique different viewpoints. The educational benefits of this rubric include fostering a deeper comprehension of global political dynamics; enhancing research and writing skills; and encouraging critical engagement with diverse political theories. By meeting these standards; students will develop the analytical tools necessary for advanced study in political science or related disciplines; as well as practical skills for careers in policy analysis; international relations; and public service. The rubric ensures a fair and transparent assessment process while promoting academic growth and intellectual curiosity.
