Undergraduate Year 3 (Junior): Philosophy of Mind Rubrics Free Download

Criteria Weight (%) Excellent (90-100%) Good (75-89%) Needs Improvement (50-74%) Poor (<50%)
Understanding of Key Concepts
40
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of key concepts
Demonstrates good understanding of key concepts
Demonstrates basic understanding of key concepts
Struggles with understanding key concepts
Critical Thinking and Analysis
30
Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking and analysis
Demonstrates good critical thinking and analysis
Demonstrates basic critical thinking and analysis
Struggles with critical thinking and analysis
Quality of Argumentation
30
Presents compelling and well-structured arguments
Presents good arguments
Presents basic arguments
Struggles with presenting arguments

Undergraduate Year 3 (Junior): Philosophy of Mind Rubric Description

This rubric is designed for third-year undergraduate students (juniors) enrolled in a Philosophy of Mind course. It provides clear criteria for evaluating student performance across key areas; including comprehension of core concepts; critical analysis; argumentation; and engagement with philosophical literature. The rubric ensures students develop a strong foundation in central topics such as consciousness; mental causation; dualism; physicalism; and the nature of mental states. By aligning expectations with measurable outcomes; the rubric helps students refine their ability to articulate complex ideas; assess competing theories; and construct well-reasoned arguments. Students will be assessed on their understanding of historical and contemporary debates in the philosophy of mind; demonstrating familiarity with influential thinkers like Descartes; Chalmers; and Dennett. The rubric emphasizes analytical depth; requiring students to evaluate arguments for strengths and weaknesses while engaging with primary and secondary sources. Written assignments and discussions will be evaluated for clarity; coherence; and logical rigor; fostering skills essential for advanced philosophical inquiry. Participation and engagement are also key components; encouraging students to contribute thoughtfully to classroom dialogues and collaborative learning. The rubric promotes intellectual curiosity by rewarding original insights and well-supported critiques of philosophical positions. Through structured feedback; students gain a clearer sense of their progress and areas for improvement; enhancing their ability to think critically and communicate effectively. By the end of the course; students will have honed their capacity to engage with abstract problems; defend nuanced positions; and appreciate the interdisciplinary connections between philosophy of mind; cognitive science; and related fields. This rubric supports a rigorous yet accessible learning experience tailored to upper-level undergraduates.

Other Grade 1 Rubrics

Your wishes are granted with GradeGenie

Save Grading Time

Grade essays 5x faster with AI suggestions while keeping your final say.

Focus on Teaching

Reclaim hours each week to spend on lesson planning and students.

Stay Consistent and Fair

Apply rubrics uniformly across all submissions for objective scoring

Grade Essays with AI

GradeGenie analyzes student writing for key criteria, suggests fair scores, and crafts actionable feedback—all aligned to your rubric. Review, tweak, and approve in minutes, not hours. Keep the human touch while letting AI handle the heavy lifting.